For the NY Times to try to scandalize this kind of integration is wrong.Selena Gomez Tests Positive for COVID-19, Cancels 'Tonight Show' Appearance 'For ex, making Gmail only accessible to Android and the Gmail app would be horrible. 'I'm sorry, but allowing for 3rd party clients is the kind of pro-competition move we want to see from dominant platforms,' Stamos tweeted on Wednesday. That can signal a healthy, interoperable ecosystem. That Facebook would have deep integrations with third-party partners is not necessarily surprising, as the company's former privacy chief Alex Stamos pointed out. At no time did we access people's private messages on Facebook or ask for the ability to do so.'

It was never that popular so we shut the feature down in 2015. 'One example of this was a feature we launched in 2014 that enabled members to recommend TV shows and movies to their Facebook friends via Messenger or Netflix. 'Over the years we have tried various ways to make Netflix more social,' a spokeswoman said. Netflix told Business Insider it didn't access anyone's messages. Facebook told The Times it found no evidence of abuse. The Times reported that Spotify, Netflix, and the Royal Bank of Canada could read, write, and even delete people's messages.īoth Spotify and Netflix, however, told The Times they were unaware they had this kind of broad access. Our API provided partners with access to the person's messages in order to power this type of feature.'Ĭiting internal Facebook documents, The Times said Spotify could see the messages of more than 70 million Facebook users a month. After signing in to your Facebook account in Spotify's desktop app, you could then send and receive messages without ever leaving the app. But people had to explicitly sign in to Facebook first to use a partner's messaging feature. 'Did partners get access to messages? Yes.

Who owns spotify facebook